Whilst I don't normally announce first instance decisions, this case contains such an amusing summary of how not to conduct a tribunal hearing (in the context of a wasted costs order) that I thought it deserved wider distribution. See paragraph 20 for the tribunal's erudite exposition of how not to conduct a case.
The decision is also interesting because of the tribunal's finding that an employment consultant was lying about being a 'not for profit' representative (so as to avoid a wasted costs order) - see paras. 23-27.
Johal v Initial City Link
[Thanks to Simon Shepherd of Schofield Sweeney for sending me this judgment]
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment