The Respondent's main witness threatened and swore at the Claimant in a car park near the tribunal (see paras. 7-9). The EAT held that:
- once intimidation of this kind has occurred, it will be a very exceptional case where it can be said that a finding that no fair trial is possible is perverse (para. 28);
- a possible exception is where the intimidation happens very late in the trial, when a fair hearing may well remain possible (para. 31).