The Court of Appeal has today overturned a line of EAT authorities on whether unreasonable delay in the statutory dismissal procedures makes the dismissal automatically unfair.
In Selvarajan v Wilmot, the employer took about four months to deal with the appeal against dismissal.
The Court of Appeal held, contrary to a line of EAT authorities, that unreasonable delay did not make the dismissal automatically unfair, as the statutory procedure had been "completed". Therefore - despite the delay - it could not be said that the procedure had "not been completed" under ERA 1996, s98A(1).
[Thanks to Joanne Woodward of 9 St John Street Chambers and Joanne Martin of Davies Arnold Cooper, both of whom acted for the successful employer, for telling me about this case]
Wednesday, 23 July 2008
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment